Ceder, Mikaela M. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9681-5129
Weman, Hannah M. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4095-6456
Johansson, Ebba https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2210-106X
Henriksson, Katharina https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5158-1912
Magnusson, Kajsa A. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9159-2985
Roman, Erika https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5418-8289
Lagerström, Malin C. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9086-2805
Funding for this research was provided by:
Vetenskapsrådet (2016-00851)
Hjärnfonden
Uppsala University
Article History
Received: 1 February 2023
Accepted: 28 April 2023
First Online: 1 June 2023
Declarations
:
: Protocols related to animal use in this study were approved by the local animal research ethical committee (Uppsala djurförsöksetiska nämnd) and followed the Swedish Animal Welfare Act [Svensk författningssamling (SFS) 2018:1192], the Swedish Animal Welfare Ordinance (SFS 2019:66) and the Regulations and General Advice for Laboratory Animals (SJVFS 2019:9, Saknr L 150; permit numbers C419/12, C39/16, 5.2.18-17971/19, 5.8.18-19421/19 and 5.8.18-11551/19). All methods are reported in accordance with ARRIVE guidelines Essential 10, where relevant. Both female and male C57BL/6J mice (Taconic, Denmark) were included in the analysis. The mice were housed with littermates in approximately 501 cm<sup>2</sup> cages (maximum 5 mice in per cage). The mice were housed in a room temperature ranging between 20 and 24 °C and humidity of 45–65% on a 12-h light:dark cycle with lights on at 6 am. All animals were provided food (diet pellets, Scanbur, Sweden) and tap water <i>ad libitum</i>. All procedures were planned and executed to minimize stress, and euthanasia was performed during the light period of the light:dark cycle.
: Not applicable.
: The authors state no conflict of interest.