Updates are available Correction dated 2023-06-20
Click to view Correction: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-023-02175-0
-
Authors
Serck, Nicolas
Piagnerelli, Michael
Augy, Jean Loup
Annoni, Filippo
Ottavy, Gregoire
Courcelle, Romain
Carbutti, Giuseppe
Lejeune, Francois
Vinsonneau, Christophe
Sauneuf, Bertrand
Lefebvre, Laurent
Higny, Julien
Grimaldi, David
Lascarrou, Jean-Baptiste https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3706-078X
- License Information
-
More Information
Article History
Received: 14 November 2022
Accepted: 14 April 2023
First Online: 27 April 2023
Change Date: 20 June 2023
Change Type: Correction
Change Details: A Correction to this paper has been published:
Change Details: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-023-02175-0
Declarations
:
: This study was performed in accordance with Good Clinical Practices and the Declaration of Helsinki principles for ethical research. For Belgium, this study was approved by the ERASME University Hospital/Université Libre Bruxelles Ethics Committee (#P2020/253), which waived the need for informed consent. For France, the study did not need country-specific ethics committee approval, according to French law (#2018 − 155 dated 2018/05/03): approval by the Belgian ethics committee was sufficient. French law does not require informed consent for retrospective healthcare studies of de-identified data (#2018 − 155 dated 2018/05/03). Individual information about the study was delivered to each survivor. The study was reported to the French data protection authority (Commission Nationale de l’Informatique et des Libertés, CNIL, #2217488).
: Not applicable.
: None.
