Crossmark

Comparison of hypoxemia, intubation procedure, and complications for non-invasive ventilation against high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy for patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: a non-randomized retrospective analysis for effectiveness and safety (NIVaHIC-aHRF)

Crossref DOI link: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-021-00402-w

Published Online: 2021-01-14

Published Print: 2021-12

Update policy: https://doi.org/10.1007/springer_crossmark_policy

Authors

Zhang, Chao https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3726-4985
Ou, Min https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9179-072X
License Information

Text and Data Mining valid from 2021-01-14

Version of Record valid from 2021-01-14
More Information

Article History

Received: 19 September 2020

Accepted: 4 January 2021

First Online: 14 January 2021

Change Date: 1 April 2021

Change Type: Update

Change Details: The original article was revised to correct the affiliation.

Change Date: 14 April 2021

Change Type: Correction

Change Details: A Correction to this paper has been published:

Change Details: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-021-00441-3

Ethics approval and consent to participate

: The designed protocol (PLA151720 dated August 6, 2020) was approved by the human ethics committee of the Chinese PLA General Hospital and the Chinese society of critical care medicine. An informed consent form was signed by patients and relatives (legally authorized person) of the enrolled patients regarding anesthesia and intubation (if required) before admission to the hospital. The study reporting adheres to the law of China and the V2008 Declarations of Helsinki.

: None.

: The authors declared that they have no conflict of interest or any other competing interest regarding results and/ or discussion reported in the research.

Updates are available Correction dated 2021-04-14

Click to view Correction: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-021-00441-3