Crossmark

Improving the normalization of complex interventions: part 1 - development of the NoMAD instrument for assessing implementation work based on normalization process theory (NPT)

Crossref DOI link: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0590-y

Published Online: 2018-11-15

Published Print: 2018-12

Update policy: https://doi.org/10.1007/springer_crossmark_policy

Authors

Rapley, Tim https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4836-4279
Girling, Melissa

Mair, Frances S.

Murray, Elizabeth

Treweek, Shaun

McColl, Elaine

Steen, Ian Nicholas

May, Carl R.

Finch, Tracy L.
Funding

Funding for this research was provided by:

Economic and Social Research Council (RES-062-23-3274, RES-062-23-3274, RES-062-23-3274, RES-062-23-3274, RES-062-23-3274, RES-062-23-3274, RES-062-23-3274, RES-062-23-3274)

National Institute for Health Research (Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care North Thames., School for Primary Care Research)
License Information

Text and Data Mining valid from 2018-11-15
More Information

Article History

Received: 8 December 2017

Accepted: 29 October 2018

First Online: 15 November 2018

Ethics approval and consent to participate

: The work was approved by the Newcastle University Ethics Committee (Reference number 00555/2012; approval granted 1/09/2012). Written consent obtained was obtained in all three rounds.

: Not applicable.

: CM and TR are members of the Editorial Board of Implementation Science. All other authors declare that they have no competing interests.

: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Document is current

Any future updates will be listed below