Document is current
Any future updates will be listed below
-
Authors
Jaenisch, Thomas
Hendrickx, Kim
Erpicum, Martin
Agulto, Liane
Tomashek, Kay M.
Dempsey, Walla
Siqueira, João Bosco
Marks, Morgan A.
Fay, Michael P.
Laughlin, Catherine
L’Azou, Maina
Leo, Yee-Sin
Narvaez, Federico
Teyssou, Remy
Thomas, Stephen J.
Tissera, Hasitha
Wallace, Derek
Wilder-Smith, Annelies
Gubler, Duane J.
Cassetti, M. Cristina http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0284-2522
-
Funding
Funding for this research was provided by:
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
Partnership for Dengue Control
- License Information
-
More Information
Article History
Received: 7 February 2018
Accepted: 1 November 2018
First Online: 15 November 2018
Authors’ information
: Not applicable.
: The Comité d’Éthique en Sciences Humaines et Sociales at the Université de Liège provided research ethics approval for this study. The participants of the Dephi method were approached during the initial expert meetings and subsequently via email. In the email, the participants were informed about the aims of the Delphi method, about the objective to publish the results, and they were given the opportunity to express their interest to participate or to opt out.
: See above. The intent to publish was documented very early in the process and the consent to participate included the consent for publication.
: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
