Crossmark

Determining a cutoff score for the family burden interview schedule using three statistical methods

Crossref DOI link: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0734-8

Published Online: 2019-05-08

Published Print: 2019-12

Update policy: https://doi.org/10.1007/springer_crossmark_policy

Authors

Yu, Yu

Liu, Zi-Wei

Zhou, Wei

Zhao, Mei

Tang, Bing-Wei

Xiao, Shui-Yuan http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7770-3797
Funding

Funding for this research was provided by:

“CMB-CSU” Collaborative Program for Mental Health Policy Development (14-188)

the National Natural Science Foundation of China (71804197)
License Information

Text and Data Mining valid from 2019-05-08
More Information

Article History

Received: 10 October 2018

Accepted: 15 April 2019

First Online: 8 May 2019

Ethics approval and consent to participate

: Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Committee of the Xiangya School of Public Health of Central South University. All participants provided written consent for the study before the interview. All procedures performed in the study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

: Not applicable.

: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.