Crossmark

Comparison of different rating scales for the use in Delphi studies: different scales lead to different consensus and show different test-retest reliability

Crossref DOI link: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-020-0912-8

Published Online: 2020-02-10

Published Print: 2020-12

Update policy: https://doi.org/10.1007/springer_crossmark_policy

Authors

Lange, Toni https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8671-7496
Kopkow, Christian https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8342-4412
Lützner, Jörg https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7162-828X
Günther, Klaus-Peter

Gravius, Sascha

Scharf, Hanns-Peter

Stöve, Johannes

Wagner, Richard

Schmitt, Jochen
License Information

Text and Data Mining valid from 2020-02-10

Version of Record valid from 2020-02-10
More Information

Article History

Received: 4 February 2019

Accepted: 24 January 2020

First Online: 10 February 2020

Ethics approval and consent to participate

: Ethical approval was obtained by the Ethical Committee of the Faculty of Medicine of the TU Dresden in November 2014 (EK 423112014). All patients gave their written informed consent before participation.

: Not applicable.

: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Document is current

Any future updates will be listed below