Humphreys, James
Nicolay, Nathalie
Braeye, Toon
Van Evercooren, Izaak
Hansen, Christian Holm
Moustsen-Helms, Ida Rask
Sacco, Chiara
Mateo-Urdiales, Alberto
Castilla, Jesús
Martínez-Baz, Iván
Machado, Ausenda
Soares, Patricia
de Gier, Brechje
Meijerink, Hinta
Monge, Susana
Bacci, Sabrina
Nunes, Baltazar
,
Funding for this research was provided by:
ECDC (ECDC/2021/018)
Article History
Received: 6 August 2025
Accepted: 8 December 2025
First Online: 17 December 2025
Declarations
:
: All study sites participating in this study conformed with their respective national and EU ethical and data protection requirements. Ethical statements for each of the participating study sites:Belgium: Data linkage and collection within the data-warehouse have been approved by the information security committee. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical approval was granted for the gathering of data from hospitalised patients by the Committee for Medical Ethics from the Ghent University Hospital (reference number BC-07507) and authorisation for possible individual data linkage using the national register number from the Information Security Committee (ISC) Social Security and Health (reference number IVC/KSZG/20/384). Linkage of hospitalised patient data to vaccination and testing within the LINK-VACC project was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee UZ Brussels-VUB on 3 February 2021 (reference number 2020/523), and authorisation from the ISC Social Security and Health (reference number IVC/KSZG/21/034).Denmark: Only administrative register data was used for the study. According to Danish law, ethics approval is exempt for such research, and the Danish Data Protection Agency, which is dedicated ethics and legal oversight body, thus waives ethical approval for the study of administrative register data when no individual contact of participants is necessary, and only aggregate results are included as findings. The study is, therefore, fully compliant with all legal and ethical requirements, and there are no further processes available regarding such studies.Navarre (Spain): The study was approved by Navarre’s Ethical Committee for Clinical Research, which waived the requirement of obtaining informed consent.Norway: Ethical approval was granted by Regional Committees for Medical and Health Research Ethics (REC) Southeast (reference number 122745). The Norwegian Institute of Public Health has performed a Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA) for Beredt C19.Portugal: The study received approval from the Ethical Committee and the Data Protection Officer of the Instituto Nacional de Saúde Doutor Ricardo Jorge. Given that data was irreversibly anonymised, the need for the participants’ informed consent was waived by the Ethical Committee.Italy: This study, based on routinely collected data, was not submitted for approval to an ethical committee because the dissemination of COVID-19 surveillance data was authorised by the Italian law N. 52 of 19 May 2022, following the law decree N. 24 of 24 March 2022 (Article n. 13). Based on the same acts, the information on COVID-19 vaccination was retrieved by the Italian National Institute of Health using data from the National Immunisation Information System of the Italian Ministry of Health. Because of the retrospective design and the large size of the population under study, in accordance with the Authorisation n. 9 released by the Italian data protection authority on 15 December 2016, the individual informed consent was not requested for the conduction of this study.
: All authors give their consent for publication.
: The authors declare no competing interests.