Crossmark

The workload for home visits by German family practitioners: an analysis of regional variation in a cross-sectional study

Crossref DOI link: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-018-0891-6

Published Online: 2019-01-04

Published Print: 2019-12

Update policy: https://doi.org/10.1007/springer_crossmark_policy

Authors

Pochert, Maik http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8143-1053
Voigt, Karen

Bortz, Martin

Sattler, Alessa

Schübel, Jeannine

Bergmann, Antje
License Information

Text and Data Mining valid from 2019-01-04
More Information

Article History

Received: 3 April 2018

Accepted: 11 December 2018

First Online: 4 January 2019

Ethics approval and consent to participate

: A positive ethic vote was confirmed by the ethics committee of the Technical University of Dresden (EK 350092013) and adheres to the Declaration of Helsinki. Written consent was obtained from every participant (FP, assistant physicians, medical assistants). According to the national guideline § 15 Medical Association’s professional code of conduct of Saxony (Berufsordnung für Ärzte in Sachsen) a patient consent was not required because patient data were documented anonymously.

: Not applicable.

: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.