Crossmark

Differences in patient-reported outcomes across multimorbidity profiles in primary care: evidence from the first cycle of the OECD Patient Reported Indicator Surveys (PaRIS)

Crossref DOI link: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-026-03460-w

Published Online: 2026-07-16

Update policy: https://doi.org/10.1007/springer_crossmark_policy

Authors

Kendir, Candan

Larrain, Nicolas

van den Berg, Michael

Guanais, Frederico

Klazinga, Niek

Kringos, Dionne

Rijken, Mieke

Valderas, Jose M
License Information

Text and Data Mining valid from 2026-07-16

Accepted Manuscript valid from 2026-07-16
More Information

Article History

Received: 15 April 2026

Accepted: 1 July 2026

First Online: 16 July 2026

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate: This study is based on secondary analysis of anonymised data from the OECD Patient-Reported Indicator Surveys. The secondary analysis was exempted from ethical review by the non-WMO Committee of the Medical Ethics Review Committee of Amsterdam University Medical Centres (FWA00032965). Original PaRIS data collection was conducted by the OECD and participating countries in accordance with relevant national ethical regulations. Informed consent to participate was obtained from all participants in accordance with national regulations. In countries where consent was waived, this was approved by the relevant ethics committees or regulatory authorities, in line with national legislation. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committees and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Consent for publication: Not applicable.

Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Document is current

Any future updates will be listed below