Wheatley, Alison
Bamford, Claire
Shaw, Caroline
Flynn, Elizabeth
Smith, Amy
Beyer, Fiona
Fox, Chris
Barber, Robert
Parry, Steve W.
Howel, Denise
Homer, Tara
Robinson, Louise
Allan, Louise M. http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8912-4901
Funding for this research was provided by:
Health Technology Assessment Programme (13/78/02)
Article History
Received: 1 October 2018
Accepted: 13 February 2019
First Online: 28 February 2019
Ethics approval and consent to participate
: Ethical review for the initial interviews and focus groups with professionals was provided by Newcastle University Research Ethics Committee (ref BH138009) and any necessary permissions obtained from research and development departments of participating Trusts. Further approvals for stakeholder interviews were given by Newcastle and North Tyneside 1 Ethics Committee (reference 15/NE/0397); Newcastle and North Tyneside 2 Ethics Committee (reference 16/NE/0011); and the Health Research Authority. Additional approvals were received from participating Trusts and Social Services Departments as required. For non-statutory agencies, approval was sought from senior managers. All participants gave written or verbal consent; verbal consent was sought for telephone interviews with professionals and for consensus panel discussions.
: Not applicable.
: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.