Harding, Andrew J. E.
Morbey, Hazel
Ahmed, Faraz
Opdebeeck, Carol
Lasrado, Reena
Williamson, Paula R.
Swarbrick, Caroline
Leroi, Iracema
Challis, David
Hellstrom, Ingrid
Burns, Alistair
Keady, John
Reilly, Siobhan T. http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4372-4415
Funding for this research was provided by:
Economic and Social Research Council (ES/L001772/1)
National Institute for Health Research (ES/L001772/1)
Article History
Received: 13 September 2018
Accepted: 12 March 2019
First Online: 27 March 2019
Ethics approval and consent to participate
: Ethics approval has been obtained from Lancaster University Research Ethics Committee and NHS Research Ethics Committee (Bangor), number 15/WA/0260.All of the participants who were asked and agreed to take part in the study gave verbal and written consent. Consent of people living with dementia was set out in the study Mental Capacity and Process Consent Protocol and conformed to Mental Capacity Act 2015 assessment of capacity. ‘Consenting in the moment’ principles guided consent of people living with dementia with capacity to consent. For one person living with dementia without capacity to consent, consultee permission was acquired and consenting in the moment principles applied during data collection with this person.
: Not applicable
: PW leads to the COMET initiative. There are no competing interests from the other authors.
: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.