Goh, Anita M. Y.
Polacsek, Meg
Malta, Sue
Doyle, Colleen
Hallam, Brendan
Gahan, Luke
Low, Lee Fay
Cooper, Claudia
Livingston, Gill
Panayiotou, Anita
Loi, Samantha M.
Omori, Maho
Savvas, Steven
Burton, Jason
Ames, David
Scherer, Samuel C.
Chau, Nadia
Roberts, Stefanie
Winbolt, Margaret
Batchelor, Frances
Dow, Briony
Article History
Received: 13 April 2021
Accepted: 8 December 2021
First Online: 11 January 2022
Declarations
:
: Ethical approval was obtained from Austin Health Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC/17/Austin/537). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants, including from all four participants living with dementia, who were deemed to have capacity to do so. Two family carers (of the four participants with dementia) also co-signed proxy informed consent for their care recipient with dementia. The research staff were trained by a neuropsychologist to assess capacity to provide consent, determined by whether the potential participant: understood the nature of the research and their participation; appreciated the consequences of their participation; showed ability to consider alternatives including the option to not participate; and showed ability to make a reasoned choice. Written and verbal techniques were used to communicate, and the potential participant was asked to explain the details back to the researcher.All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations.
: Not Applicable.
: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.