Document is current
Any future updates will be listed below
-
Authors
Van Houten, Miriam E.
Van Boekel, Regina L M.
Vloet, Lilian C. M.
Olde Rikkert, Marcel G. M.
Akkermans, Reinier
Van De Kerkhof-Van Bon, Brigitte
Jie, Kim E.
Lucke, Jacinta A.
Schoon, Yvonne
Berben, Sivera A. A.
-
Funding
Funding for this research was provided by:
The Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (dossier 57 number 10260022010005)
The Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (dossier 57 number 10260022010005)
The Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (dossier 57 number 10260022010005)
The Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (dossier 57 number 10260022010005)
The Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (dossier 57 number 10260022010005)
The Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (dossier 57 number 10260022010005)
The Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (dossier 57 number 10260022010005)
The Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (dossier 57 number 10260022010005)
The Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (dossier 57 number 10260022010005)
The Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (dossier 57 number 10260022010005)
- License Information
-
More Information
Article History
Received: 22 April 2024
Accepted: 11 September 2025
First Online: 30 December 2025
Declarations
:
: The study protocol was submitted for review by law to the institutional review board of the Radboud University Medical Centre. The review board ethically approved the study (authorization number: 2020–7252). All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations applicable to research with human subjects, such as the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki and the Medical research Involving Human Subjects Act. No informed consent from all subjects and/or their legal guardians(s) was deemed necessary by the institutional review board because the subjects did not have to do or abstain from something on behalf of the research. The study did not pose any additional (mental) risk for patients and was deemed normal good patient care.
: Not applicable.
: The authors declare no competing interests.
