Document is current
Any future updates will be listed below
-
Authors
Oliver, Sandy
Uhm, Seilin
Duley, Lelia https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6721-5178
Crowe, Sally
David, Anna L.
James, Catherine P.
Chivers, Zoe
Gyte, Gill
Gale, Chris
Turner, Mark
Chambers, Bev
Dowling, Irene
McNeill, Jenny
Alderdice, Fiona
Shennan, Andrew
Deshpande, Sanjeev
-
Funding
Funding for this research was provided by:
Programme Grants for Applied Research (RP-PG--609-10107)
- License Information
-
More Information
Article History
Received: 1 May 2018
Accepted: 29 November 2019
First Online: 30 December 2019
Ethics approval and consent to participate
: Research Ethics Committee approval for the whole priority setting exercise was obtained from the Institute of Education, University of London (reference FCL 318), and for distribution of paper versions of the survey and voting was from the North Wales REC (Central & East) Research Ethics Committee (reference /WA/0286). Forms for both the survey of uncertainties and voting were self-completed, and consent was assumed if the form was completed and submitted (online) or returned (paper version). Consent for public surveys of this type of was not required by the NHS research ethics committees. For the nested qualitative study, consent to sound record meetings was given verbally by members of the steering group and the workshop participants.
: Not applicable.
: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
