Silverio, Sergio A. http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7177-3471
George-Carey, Rhiannon http://orcid.org/0009-0009-7681-9905
Memtsa, Maria http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6274-0800
Kent-Nye, Flora E. http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4693-9470
Magee, Laura A. http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1355-610X
Sheen, Kayleigh S. http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1254-1763
Burgess, Karen http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6256-116X
Oza, Munira http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2180-7896
Storey, Claire http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5428-9909
Sandall, Jane http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2000-743X
,
Sampson, Amy
Haddad, Leonie
Payne, Elana
Sambrook, Laura
Goodhart, Venetia
Easter, Abigail http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4462-6537
von Dadelszen, Peter http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4136-3070
Jurković, Davor http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6487-5736
Article History
Received: 10 November 2023
Accepted: 26 July 2024
First Online: 9 August 2024
Declarations
:
: Ethical approvals for PUDDLES-Early Pregnancy Loss were sought from and granted by the King’s College London Health Faculties Research Ethics Sub-committee (ref:- HR/DP-21/22–28808). All participants provided consent to participate. An interview method was utilised in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations, with the interview schedule (Additional file 1) having been approved by the Research Ethics Committee. Informed consent was obtained from all study participants electronically either where they completed and signed consent forms as a PDF and returned them to the researcher via e-mail; or where participants printed, manually completed and signed consent forms, and scanned them back to the researcher via e-mail. Where neither electronic method was possible, a verbal consent was employed with the researcher recorded a reading of the consent form with replies from the participant confirming consent recorded on an electronic copy of the consent form at the beginning of the interview. How participants provided consent was be recorded and where verbal consent was given, a copy was sent to the participant as well as being retained on the study file. Those who completed electronic consent forms retained their copy with the e-mailed version being saved on the study file. All methods of consent were approved by the Research Ethics Committee as pragmatic ways of conducting qualitative research virtually during the COVID-19 pandemic due to traditional ‘wet signature’ consent not being possible in light of lockdown restrictions. All participants were also made aware of their right to withdraw.
: Not applicable.
: The authors declare no competing interests.