Document is current

Article History

Received: 23 March 2018

Accepted: 29 October 2018

First Online: 12 November 2018

Authors’ information

: Not applicable.

: As this is a single case study that is reporting findings in retrospect, which had no intent of prospectively testing a hypothesis, Institutional Review Board approval was not sought. Verbal informed consent was obtained from the patient and was verified by two physicians who were present in person.

: Verbal informed consent has been obtained from the patient. Given that no standard consent form was available at the time consent was obtained, verbal informed consent from the patient was considered sufficient rather than written informed consent.

: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.