Crossmark

Decisional conflict of physicians during the decision-making process for a simulated advanced-stage cancer patient: an international longitudinal study with German and Belgian physicians

Crossref DOI link: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-5071-5

Published Online: 2018-11-23

Published Print: 2018-12

Update policy: https://doi.org/10.1007/springer_crossmark_policy

Authors

Schoenfeld, Catharina

Libert, Yves

Sattel, Heribert

Canivet, Delphine

Delevallez, France

Dinkel, Andreas

Berberat, Pascal O.

Wuensch, Alexander http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4893-290X
Razavi, Darius
Funding

Funding for this research was provided by:

Medical Faculty of the Technical University of Munich, Germany
License Information

Text and Data Mining valid from 2018-11-23
More Information

Article History

Received: 28 August 2018

Accepted: 9 November 2018

First Online: 23 November 2018

Ethics approval and consent to participate

: Participants agreed to the conditions of the study by written informed consent. The local ethics committee of the Medical Faculty of the Technical University Munich also gave their approval for the implementation of this study (approval Feb 11th, 2015; sign 38/15). Data were matched with a Belgian sample. The ethics committee of Jules Bordet Institute in Brussels Belgium gave also its approval. All participating physicians are unidentifiable.

: Not applicable.

: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Document is current

Any future updates will be listed below