Santoro, A.
Piermattei, A.
Inzani, F.
Angelico, G.
Valente, M.
Arciuolo, D.
Spadola, S.
Martini, M.
Fanfani, F.
Fagotti, A.
Gallotta, V.
Scambia, G.
Zannoni, G. F. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4473-7560
Article History
Received: 2 August 2019
Accepted: 31 October 2019
First Online: 12 November 2019
Ethics approval and consent to participate
: The retrospective study was performed on clinical and pathological data from 202 women with a preoperatively ambiguous vs inconclusive vs suspected histological and instrumental diagnosis for endometrial carcinoma who underwent to surgical staging from January 2012 to December 2018 at the Department of Gynecology, Fondazione ‘Policlinico Gemelli’, Rome, Italy.The study was planned and conducted in compliance with the rules of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the University Ethical Committee for Research and Review Board of the “Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS,” Rome.The study was approved by the University Ethical Committee for Research and Review Board of the Fondazione ‘Policlinico Gemelli’ and written consent was requested and obtained from all patients before hospitalization.
: Not applicable
: Francesco Fanfani and Maurizio Martini, are members of the editorial board of this journal.The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.