Crossmark

Service-users’ perspectives of link worker social prescribing: a qualitative follow-up study

Crossref DOI link: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-6349-x

Published Online: 2019-01-22

Published Print: 2019-12

Update policy: https://doi.org/10.1007/springer_crossmark_policy

Authors

Wildman, Josephine M. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9669-6708
Moffatt, Suzanne

Steer, Mel

Laing, Kirsty

Penn, Linda

O’Brien, Nicola
License Information

Text and Data Mining valid from 2019-01-22
More Information

Article History

Received: 11 January 2018

Accepted: 20 December 2018

First Online: 22 January 2019

Ethics approval and consent to participate

: Ethical approval for the study was obtained from Newcastle University Faculty of Medical Sciences Research Ethics Committee (reference 01011). Participants were given written information about the study, were informed that participation was voluntary, that they could withdraw at any time and that confidentiality was assured. Informed written consent was obtained.

: Not applicable.

: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.