Document is current
Any future updates will be listed below
-
Authors
,
Dickerson, Josie http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0121-3406
,
Bird, Philippa K.
Bryant, Maria
Dharni, Nimarta
Bridges, Sally
Willan, Kathryn
Ahern, Sara
Dunn, Abigail
Nielsen, Dea
Uphoff, Eleonora P.
Bywater, Tracey
Bowyer-Crane, Claudine
Sahota, Pinki
Small, Neil
Howell, Michaela
Thornton, Gill
Pickett, Kate E.
McEachan, Rosemary R. C.
Wright, John
-
Funding
Funding for this research was provided by:
Big Lottery Fund
- License Information
-
More Information
Article History
Received: 20 April 2018
Accepted: 15 February 2019
First Online: 4 March 2019
Ethics approval and consent to participate
: The protocol for recruitment into BiBBS, and the collection and use of the BiBBS cohort baseline and routine outcome data and biological samples for the evaluation of Better Start Bradford interventions (including Trials within Cohorts) has been approved by Bradford Leeds NHS Research Ethics Committee (15/YH/0455). BiBBS takes written informed consent from all participants. The Health Research Authority have confirmed that monitoring and implementation evaluations of Better Start Bradford interventions (i.e. evaluations using intervention monitoring data and qualitative work) are service evaluation, not research, and as such do not require review by an NHS Research Ethics Committee (HRA decision 60/88/81).
: Not applicable.
: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
