Crossmark

Hypertension in a rural community in South Africa: what they know, what they think they know and what they recommend

Crossref DOI link: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-6642-3

Published Online: 2019-03-25

Published Print: 2019-12

Update policy: https://doi.org/10.1007/springer_crossmark_policy

Authors

Jongen, Vita W.

Lalla-Edward, Samanta T.

Vos, Alinda G.

Godijk, Noortje G.

Tempelman, Hugo

Grobbee, Diederick E.

Devillé, Walter

Klipstein-Grobusch, Kerstin http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5462-9889
License Information

Text and Data Mining valid from 2019-03-25
More Information

Article History

Received: 22 June 2018

Accepted: 10 March 2019

First Online: 25 March 2019

Ethics approval and consent to participate

: Ethical approvals for the NCS (227/2014) and this sub study (227/2017) were granted by the Medical Human Research Ethics Committee of the University of Pretoria.Prior to enrolment into this study, participants received a written and verbal overview of the content of the study and were asked to sign an informed consent form. FDG participants also signed a consent form to being audio recorded. Participants consented to the inclusion of their demographic data in any NCS (and sub study) aggregated analyses during their enrolment in the NCS.

: All participants consented to being quoted in this publication.

: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.