Document is current
Any future updates will be listed below
-
Authors
Seekaew, Pich http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3941-3457
Nguyen, Ezie
Sungsing, Thanthip
Jantarapakde, Jureeporn
Pengnonyang, Supabhorn
Trachunthong, Deondara
Mingkwanrungruang, Pravit
Sirisakyot, Waraporn
Phiayura, Pattareeya
Panpet, Phubet
Meekrua, Phathranis
Praweprai, Nanthika
Suwan, Fonthip
Sangtong, Supakarn
Brutrat, Pornpichit
Wongsri, Tashada
Nakorn, Panus Rattakittvijun Na
Mills, Stephen
Avery, Matthew
Vannakit, Ravipa
Phanuphak, Praphan
Phanuphak, Nittaya
-
Funding
Funding for this research was provided by:
United States Agency for International Development (AID-OAA-A-14-00045)
- License Information
-
More Information
Article History
Received: 16 August 2018
Accepted: 11 March 2019
First Online: 21 March 2019
Ethics approval and consent to participate
: The study was approved by the Ethics Research Committee/ Institutional Review Board (IRB) at Chulalongkorn University, Faculty of Medicine, Bangkok, Thailand. For this study, verbal consent was obtained from the participants upon enrollment of the Princess PrEP Program. Verbal consent was obtained instead of written consent, which was approved by the IRB, as HIV testing and PrEP dispensing were part of routine services provided by these community-based organizations. To ensure that the participants were adequately informed, each participant had to do the survey assessing their willingness and knowledge about PrEP. Participants with satisfactory results were provided PrEP. Clients who were not ready and/or declined any of the services were recorded, and did not received such services.
: Not applicable.
: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
