Crossmark

A qualitative analysis of perceptions of various stakeholders on nutrition-sensitive agricultural interventions, including the taxation on sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs), to improve overall health and nutrition in South Africa

Crossref DOI link: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09440-8

Published Online: 2020-09-03

Published Print: 2020-12

Update policy: https://doi.org/10.1007/springer_crossmark_policy

Authors

Kaltenbrun, Tayla Ashton https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7474-0955
du Plessis, Lisanne Monica

Drimie, Scott
License Information

Text and Data Mining valid from 2020-09-03

Version of Record valid from 2020-09-03
More Information

Article History

Received: 5 March 2020

Accepted: 24 August 2020

First Online: 3 September 2020

Ethics approval and consent to participants

: Ethical approval was obtained from the Health Research Ethics Committee of Stellenbosch University (Ref. no. 18/10/212). Approval was also obtained from each sector/business (except for the Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries). National and Provincial Health Research and Ethics Committee of South Africa approval was received for the interviews conducted at the Department of Health (Ref. no. GP_ 201901_034).Informed consent was obtained from each participant selected to participate in the study. The informed consent form included consent to being audio-recorded. Every participant that agreed to be part of the research gave written consent. Each individual’s autonomy and confidentiality were respected and ensured throughout the research process.

: Patients signed informed consent regarding publishing their data.

: None declared.

Document is current

Any future updates will be listed below