Smith, Louise E. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1277-2564
Potts, Henry W. W. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6200-8804
Amlȏt, Richard
Fear, Nicola T. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5792-2925
Michie, Susan https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0063-6378
Rubin, G. James
Funding for this research was provided by:
Department of Health and Social Care
National Institute for Health Research (11/46/21)
Article History
Received: 29 December 2020
Accepted: 15 February 2022
First Online: 10 March 2022
Change Date: 10 June 2022
Change Type: Correction
Change Details: A Correction to this paper has been published:
Change Details: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13472-7
Declarations
:
: This work was conducted as part of a service evaluation of the marketing and communications run by the Department of Health and Social Care, and so did not require ethical approval. We sought advice from the Psychiatry, Nursing and Midwifery Research Ethics Office, King’s College London and they confirmed this position. Participants of online research panels have consented to being contacted to take part in online surveys. Following industry standards, consent was implied by participants’ completion of the survey.
: Not applicable.
: All authors had financial support from NIHR for the submitted work; RA is an employee of the UK Health Security Agency; HWWP has received additional salary support from Public Health England and NHS England; HWWP receives consultancy fees to his employer from Ipsos MORI and has a PhD student who works at and has fees paid by AstraZeneca; NTF is a participant of an independent group advising NHS Digital on the release of patient data. All authors are members of the UK’s Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies or its subgroups. There are no other financial relationships with any organisations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous 3 years and no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.