Bunn, Christopher https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6604-1305
Palmer, Victoria
Chng, Nai Rui
Andersen, Eivind
Gray, Cindy M.
Hunt, Kate
Jelsma, Judith G. M.
Morgan, Heather
der Sanden, Maria Nijhuis-van
Pereira, Hugo V.
Philpott, Matthew
Roberts, Glyn C.
Rooksby, John
Røynesdal, Øystein B.
Silva, Marlene N.
Sørensen, Marit
Teixeira, Pedro J.
van Achterberg, Theo
van de Glind, Irene
van Mechelen, Willem
van Nassau, Femke
van der Ploeg, Hidde P.
Wyke, Sally
Article History
Received: 21 November 2022
Accepted: 10 March 2023
First Online: 20 March 2023
Declarations
:
: Ethical approvals for the RCT and the process evaluation were obtained from appropriate country-specific ethics committees (Ethics Committee of the VU University Medical Center [2015.184]; Regional Committees for Medical and Health Research Ethics, Norway [2015/1862]; Ethics Council of the Faculty of Human Kinetics, University of Lisbon [CEFMH 36/2015]; and Ethics Committee at the University of Glasgow College of Medicine, Veterinary and Life Sciences [200140174]). All methods were deployed in this study were performed in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations, and all participants provided written informed consent.
: Not applicable.
: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.