Document is current
Any future updates will be listed below
-
Authors
Voss, Stephan https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2497-8065
Bauer, Julia https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4634-5146
Coenen, Michaela https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7492-7907
Jung-Sievers, Caroline https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2133-4766
Moore, Graham https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6136-3978
Rehfuess, Eva https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4318-8846
-
Funding
Funding for this research was provided by:
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
- License Information
-
More Information
Article History
Received: 31 January 2025
Accepted: 13 May 2025
First Online: 24 May 2025
Declarations
:
: The study was conducted in accordance with the ethical guidelines in the Declaration of Helsinki. For all team-internal processes during the development of the logic model, no ethics approval was required, as they used literature reviews and reflections within the team. For the workshops with the advisory group, we obtained a waiver from the Ethics Committee of the Medical Faculty at LMU Munich (Ethikkommission an der Medizinischen Fakultät an der LMU München), which confirmed that no ethics approval was required (22–0910). As all data during the workshops with the advisory group was collected anonymously, according to the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) of the European Union, participants did not have to provide informed consent before participating. Members of the advisory group were, however, informed about the objectives and the procedure of the workshops before each event. Following this provision of information, they could decide whether they wanted to participate or not.
: Not applicable.
: The authors declare no competing interests.
