Crossmark

Reply to: ‘Mislabeling and inappropriate analysis render interpretations from “The effect of the participatory heat education and awareness tools (HEAT) intervention on agricultural worker physiological heat strain: results from a parallel, comparison, group randomized study” unreliable’

Crossref DOI link: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-026-26682-0

Published Online: 2026-04-30

Update policy: https://doi.org/10.1007/springer_crossmark_policy

Authors

Spector, June

Cardoso, Tamre

Sheppard, Lianne
License Information

Text and Data Mining valid from 2026-04-30

Version of Record valid from 2026-04-30
More Information

Article History

Received: 29 May 2025

Accepted: 11 February 2026

First Online: 30 April 2026

Declarations

:

: No new datasets were generated or analyzed. The University of Washington Human Subjects Division (HSD) approved all study procedures, and participants provided written informed consent prior to study participation for the original study. For additional information, see the original publication: Chavez Santos E, Spector JT, Egbert J, Krenz J, Sampson PD, Palmández P, Torres E, Blancas M, Carmona J, Jung J, Flunker JC. The effect of the participatory heat education and awareness tools (HEAT) intervention on agricultural worker physiological heat strain: results from a parallel, comparison, group randomized study. BMC Public Health 2022 Sep 15;22 [ ]:1746. doi: . PMID: 36104813; PMCID: PMC9476265.

: Not applicable.

: The authors declare no competing interests.

Document is current

Any future updates will be listed below