Crossmark

Silver-coated modular Megaendoprostheses in salvage revision arthroplasty after periimplant infection with extensive bone loss – a pilot study of 34 patients

Crossref DOI link: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-017-1742-7

Published Online: 2017-09-02

Published Print: 2017-12

Update policy: https://doi.org/10.1007/springer_crossmark_policy

Authors

Zajonz, Dirk https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4818-0413
Birke, Undine

Ghanem, Mohamed

Prietzel, Torsten

Josten, Christoph

Roth, Andreas

Fakler, Johannes K.M.
License Information

Text and Data Mining valid from 2017-09-02
More Information

Article History

Received: 1 April 2017

Accepted: 28 August 2017

First Online: 2 September 2017

Ethics approval and consent to participate

: The ethics committee of the University Hospital Leipzig, Germany granted ethical approval (ref. no. 355/16-ek). The committee is listed in the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP) IORG0001320, IRB00001750. The patients in our study did provide consent to participate and to publish of all anonymised data.

: All participating patients gave written, informed consent in the treatment contract, the study and in the publication of the anonymised data.

: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Document is current

Any future updates will be listed below