Crossmark

Anterior cruciate ligament remnant‐preserving and re‐tensioning reconstruction: a biomechanical comparison study of three different re‐tensioning methods in a porcine model

Crossref DOI link: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-03955-w

Published Online: 2021-02-03

Published Print: 2021-12

Update policy: https://doi.org/10.1007/springer_crossmark_policy

Authors

Ryu, Dong Jin

Kwon, Kyeu Back

Hong, Da Hee

Park, Sang Jun

Park, Jae Sung

Wang, Joon Ho https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6530-795X
Funding

Funding for this research was provided by:

the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (HI15C2424)

the Ministry of Science and ICT (NRF-2017R1A2B3007362)
License Information

Text and Data Mining valid from 2021-02-03

Version of Record valid from 2021-02-03
More Information

Article History

Received: 14 September 2020

Accepted: 4 January 2021

First Online: 3 February 2021

Ethics approval and consent to participate

: This study used fresh frozen porcine knees are derived as a by-product of the food industry which is not subject to Institutional Review Board or the Animal experimentation Ethics Committee approval. We obtained the porcine knees by Cellumed (Seoul, Korea).

: Not applicable.

: The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest in the authorship and publication of this article.

Document is current

Any future updates will be listed below