Crossmark

Comparative evaluation of posterior percutaneous endoscopy cervical discectomy using a 3.7 mm endoscope and a 6.9 mm endoscope for cervical disc herniation: a retrospective comparative cohort study

Crossref DOI link: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-03980-9

Published Online: 2021-02-02

Published Print: 2021-12

Update policy: https://doi.org/10.1007/springer_crossmark_policy

Authors

Yu, Tong

Wu, Jiu-Ping

Zhang, Jun

Yu, Hai-Chi

Liu, Qin-Yi http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2700-1305
License Information

Text and Data Mining valid from 2021-02-02

Version of Record valid from 2021-02-02
More Information

Article History

Received: 6 January 2020

Accepted: 14 January 2021

First Online: 2 February 2021

Ethics approval and consent to participate

: This report was approved by the ethics committee of the Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China (In 2020, research review No. 188). All patients included in the study signed written informed consent.

: Not applicable.

: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Document is current

Any future updates will be listed below