Crossmark

Acceptability of, and preferences for, remote consulting during COVID-19 among older patients with two common long-term musculoskeletal conditions: findings from three qualitative studies and recommendations for practice

Crossref DOI link: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05273-1

Published Online: 2022-04-02

Published Print: 2022-12

Update policy: https://doi.org/10.1007/springer_crossmark_policy

Authors

Paskins, Zoe https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7783-2986
Bullock, Laurna https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4193-1835
Manning, Fay https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9768-1695
Bishop, Simon https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8527-7081
Campbell, Paul https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9148-882X
Cottrell, Elizabeth

Partner, G. P.

Jinks, Clare https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3407-2446
Narayanasamy, Melanie https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3483-0777
Scott, Ian C. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1268-9808
Sahota, Opinder https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0055-7637
Ryan, Sarah https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2202-6266
License Information

Text and Data Mining valid from 2022-04-02

Version of Record valid from 2022-04-02
More Information

Article History

Received: 24 December 2021

Accepted: 23 March 2022

First Online: 2 April 2022

Declarations

:

: The three studies – iFraP (improving fracture prevention study; North West - Greater Manchester West Research Ethics Committee, REF: 19/NW/0559), Blast Off (BO; Bisphosphonate aLternAtive regimenS for the prevenTion of Osteoporotic Fragility Fractures; North West - Preston Research Ethics Committee, REF: 19/NW/0714), and ERA (Exploring people with RAs’ experience of the pandemic; Camden and Kings Cross Research Ethics Committee, REF: 20/HRA/3406). Informed consent was obtained from all participants. All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.

: Not applicable.

: The authors declare no competing interests

Document is current

Any future updates will be listed below