Crossmark

To scan or not to scan? Comparing the effectiveness and cost differential of insoles manufactured from foam-box casts versus direct scans in treating musculoskeletal conditions of the foot and ankle: a double-blinded, randomised controlled trial

Crossref DOI link: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-025-08513-2

Published Online: 2025-03-22

Update policy: https://doi.org/10.1007/springer_crossmark_policy

Authors

Barr, Laura

Richards, Jim

Dickson, Colette

Tawse, Jillian

Munro, Nikki

Scott, Hannah

Holland, Aimie

Chapman, Graham J.
Funding

Funding for this research was provided by:

NHS Education for Scotland (E42002/ENES7705)

NHS Research Scotland (NRS/23/NM03)
License Information

Text and Data Mining valid from 2025-03-22

Version of Record valid from 2025-03-22
More Information

Article History

Received: 30 January 2025

Accepted: 10 March 2025

First Online: 22 March 2025

Declarations

:

: Ethical approval for this trial was obtained from London Stanmore Research Ethics Committee (22/LO/0579), and the trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov. All participants provided written informed consent to participate in the study prior to data collection. This trial was performed according to the Declaration of Helsinki.

: Not applicable.

: The authors declare no competing interests.

Document is current

Any future updates will be listed below