Crossmark

Is P TO P (Pedicle-To-Pedicle) technique superior to bilateral percutaneous vertebral augmentation for thoracic and lumbar osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture? Evidence from a retrospective study

Crossref DOI link: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-026-09583-6

Published Online: 2026-02-10

Update policy: https://doi.org/10.1007/springer_crossmark_policy

Authors

Yang, Bo

Wang, Shenghai
Funding

Funding for this research was provided by:

Shaanxi Province Health and Wellness Scientific Research Innovation Capacity Enhancement Project (2024PT-16)
License Information

Text and Data Mining valid from 2026-02-10

Version of Record valid from 2026-03-16
More Information

Article History

Received: 17 June 2025

Accepted: 2 February 2026

First Online: 10 February 2026

Declarations

:

: The portions of this study involving human participants, human materials, or human data were conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and were approved by the Hanzhong Central Hospital Ethics Review Board (2024–82). We communicated with each participant by telephone and obtained verbal consent to participate in the study.

: Not applicable.

: The authors declare no competing interests.

Document is current

Any future updates will be listed below