Crossmark

Laparoscopy is an available alternative to open surgery in the treatment of perforated peptic ulcers: a retrospective multicenter study

Crossref DOI link: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-018-0413-4

Published Online: 2018-09-25

Published Print: 2018-12

Update policy: https://doi.org/10.1007/springer_crossmark_policy

Authors

Mirabella, Antonino

Fiorentini, Tiziana

Tutino, Roberta https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0891-4689
Falco, Nicolò

Fontana, Tommaso

De Marco, Paolino

Gulotta, Eliana

Gulotta, Leonardo

Licari, Leo

Salamone, Giuseppe

Melfa, Irene

Scerrino, Gregorio

Lupo, Massimo

Speciale, Armando

Cocorullo, Gianfranco
License Information

Text and Data Mining valid from 2018-09-25
More Information

Article History

Received: 30 April 2018

Accepted: 17 September 2018

First Online: 25 September 2018

Ethics approval and consent to participate

: This retrospective study was approved by the local ethics committee, Comitato etico Palermo 1, Azienda Opedaliera Universitaria Policlinico Paolo Giaccone di Palermo, verbale n.04/2017, and is in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was obtained from the patients.

: Not applicable.

: The authors declare that they have no competing interest.

: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.