Zhang, Shijie
Liang, Hao
Liu, Lei
Li, Peixin
Yang, Qingya
Qu, Sifeng
Liu, Jingchao
Shi, Benkang
Zhang, Nianzhao
Chen, Jun
Funding for this research was provided by:
Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (ZR2023MH231)
Qingdao Science and Technology Demonstration and Guidance Special Fund for the Benefit of the People (21-1-4-rkjk-7-nsh)
Article History
Received: 15 July 2025
Accepted: 10 September 2025
First Online: 9 October 2025
Declarations
:
: This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Approval was granted by the Clinical Trial Ethics Committee of Qilu Hospital of Shandong University (Qingdao) (Ethics approval number: KYLL-KS-2022048). All animal experiments were conducted following the national guidelines and the relevant national laws on the protection of animals. The animal care and experimental protocols were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee, Shandong University. Institutional review board approval number was KYLL-2023(ZM)-001.All patients considered for this technique were informed that it represented a new anastomotic method, including its principles, expected benefits, potential unknown risks, and distinctions from established approaches such as the Bricker technique. Written informed consent to participate was obtained from all participants before the surgery.
: The authors declare no competing interests.