Crossmark

Comparative analysis of laparoscopic internal ring reinforcement combined with high ligation versus double-loop high ligation in the treatment of pediatric giant inguinal hernia

Crossref DOI link: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-026-04056-y

Published Online: 2026-07-21

Update policy: https://doi.org/10.1007/springer_crossmark_policy

Authors

He, Qingbao

He, Hongjia

Li, Kaisheng

Liu, Xiaoyang
License Information

Text and Data Mining valid from 2026-07-21

Accepted Manuscript valid from 2026-07-21
More Information

Article History

Received: 8 March 2026

Accepted: 14 July 2026

First Online: 21 July 2026

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate: This retrospective study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Children’s Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University on January 15, 2026 (Approval No. SDFE-IRB/T-2026008) for the retrospective review and analysis of previously collected clinical data. All procedures involving human participants were performed as part of routine clinical care before the initiation of the present retrospective study. The study was conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the Institutional Review Board and the Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. Because of the retrospective nature of the study, the requirement for informed consent was waived by the Institutional Review Board.

Consent for publication: Not applicable.

Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Document is current

Any future updates will be listed below