Document is current
Any future updates will be listed below
-
Authors
Memarian, Ensieh https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8214-917X
Carrasco, Daniel
Thulesius, Hans
Calling, Susanna
-
Funding
Funding for this research was provided by:
Ernhold Lundström Stiftelse
ALF funding from Region Skåne
- License Information
-
More Information
Article History
Received: 30 November 2020
Accepted: 21 March 2021
First Online: 8 April 2021
Declarations
:
: The surveys were answered anonymously. According to Swedish legislation about ethical review of research involving humans (3–4 §§,, Lag [2003:460] om etikprövning av. forskning som avser människor, in Swedish), application to the Swedish Ethical Review Authority (EPM) was not required, as the survey was anonymous and did not contain what the EPM considers as sensitive personal data.The electronic survey included a brief information in the beginning indicating that participation was voluntary and that the responses were collected anonymously. A survey response by the physicians was considered as a consent to participate. The need to obtain other forms of consent from participants was not necessary, according to the EPM as the survey was sent electronically, and the participants answered voluntarily and anonymously.
: Not applicable.
: The Authors declare that they have no competing interest.
