Crossmark

Shared decision making with oncologists and palliative care specialists effectively increases the documentation of the preferences for do not resuscitate and artificial nutrition and hydration in patients with advanced cancer: a model testing study

Crossref DOI link: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-020-0521-7

Published Online: 2020-02-04

Published Print: 2020-12

Update policy: https://doi.org/10.1007/springer_crossmark_policy

Authors

Huang, Hsien-Liang

Tsai, Jaw-Shiun

Yao, Chien-An

Cheng, Shao-Yi

Hu, Wen-Yu

Chiu, Tai-Yuan http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8528-7981
License Information

Text and Data Mining valid from 2020-02-04

Version of Record valid from 2020-02-04
More Information

Article History

Received: 16 July 2019

Accepted: 20 January 2020

First Online: 4 February 2020

Ethics approval and consent to participate

: All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Verbal consent was chosen to reduce research-related burden on participants in the model. The National Taiwan University Hospital Research Ethics Committee (approval number: 201901144RINB) approved the study.

: Not applicable.

: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Document is current

Any future updates will be listed below