Crossmark

“Respecting our patients’ choices”: making the organizational decision to participate in voluntary assisted dying provision: findings from semi-structured interviews with a rural community hospice board of management

Crossref DOI link: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-022-01051-x

Published Online: 2022-09-16

Update policy: https://doi.org/10.1007/springer_crossmark_policy

Authors

Auret, Kirsten

Pikora, Terri J.

Gersbach, Kate

Donovan, Robert J.
License Information

Text and Data Mining valid from 2022-09-16

Version of Record valid from 2022-09-16
More Information

Article History

Received: 3 June 2022

Accepted: 8 September 2022

First Online: 16 September 2022

Declarations

:

: Ethics approval was granted through the University of Western Australia Human Research Ethics Committee (2019/RA/4/20/6324). This study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and followed relevant guidelines and regulations. All participants provided written informed consent prior to participation.

: Not applicable.

: This work was supported by funding from the Albany Community Hospice. KA wishes to disclose that she is a palliative medicine specialist and academic with links to ACH as a committee volunteer and provides specialist consultation to GPs. She was a representative on the Ministerial Expert Panel which advised government on the original VAD bill. KG was a research nurse at ACH. TP and RD have no conflict of interest to declare.

Document is current

Any future updates will be listed below