Crossmark

Comparing in-person and virtual delivery of a national ophthalmology revision course: a mixed-methods evaluation

Published Online: 2025-11-27

Authors

Jafari, Keya https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8501-5222
Kerr, E

Seyed-Safi, A

Okhravi, N

Mathew, R G
License Information

Text and Data Mining valid from 2025-11-27

Version of Record valid from 2025-11-27
More Information

Article History

Received: 17 September 2024

Accepted: 21 October 2025

First Online: 27 November 2025

Declarations

:

: Advice was sought from UCL Research Ethics Committee. As a service evaluation with no pre-determined standards, this study was deemed exempt from ethics approval. The evaluation did not involve any changes to the service being delivered for the purpose of the review. Additionally, the NHS HRA REC toolkit was used ( ) and deemed this study not to require formal ethics approval.The need for informed consent to participate was deemed unnecessary by UCL Research Ethics Committee. Feedback was acquired anonymously on an entirely voluntary basis as part of a service evaluation.

: Not Applicable.

: The authors declare no competing interests.

Document is current