Crossmark

Research approvals iceberg: how a ‘low-key’ study in England needed 89 professionals to approve it and how we can do better

Crossref DOI link: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-018-0339-5

Published Online: 2019-01-25

Published Print: 2019-12

Update policy: https://doi.org/10.1007/springer_crossmark_policy

Authors

Petrova, Mila https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7351-6815
Barclay, Stephen
Funding

Funding for this research was provided by:

Health Innovation and Education Cluster

National Institute for Health Research

Marie Curie Cancer Care (RG87570)
License Information

Text and Data Mining valid from 2019-01-25
More Information

Article History

Received: 22 August 2018

Accepted: 25 December 2018

First Online: 25 January 2019

Ethics approval and consent to participate

: For “Prepared to Share?” study: 13/EE/0291, NRES Committee East of England – Cambridge East. Written informed consent was obtained from interviewee participants. For questionnaire respondents, returning the questionnaire was considered to demonstrate consent to participate.

: Not applicable.

: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.