Document is current
Any future updates will be listed below
-
Authors
Gerritse, Karl https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8997-0596
Martens, Casper
Bremmer, Marijke A. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0415-1127
Kreukels, Baudewijntje P. C. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9713-4835
de Boer, Fijgje https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4167-563X
Molewijk, Bert C. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1944-9759
- License Information
-
More Information
Article History
Received: 7 July 2022
Accepted: 20 December 2022
First Online: 27 December 2022
Declarations
:
: The methods used to carry out the study followed the Declaration of Helsinki and all other relevant guidelines. We submitted the study protocol for review to an officially accredited IRB/REC, the Medical Ethics Committee of the Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, which issued a declaration that under Dutch law, a full ethical review was not necessary (IRB00002991, April 21, 2020). We informed eligible respondents via e-mail about the study and their rights at least a week before the interview. We emphasized that participation in the study was voluntary and that participants could withdraw from the study at any moment. We provided the opportunity to ask questions and obtained written informed consent before the interview. We also obtained oral informed consent at the start of the interview after reiterating the study objectives and data management. Given the relatively small number of clinicians working in Dutch GAMC, privacy and anonymity were subject to concern. We preserved participant anonymity (and, by extension, that of their clients) in this writing by using pseudonyms. Furthermore, we omitted the locations of the participating institutions, some demographic characteristics such as age and gender, and specifics regarding cases or HCPs’ current positions.
: Not applicable.
: Not applicable.
