Crossmark

Are publicly available internet resources enabling women to make informed fertility preservation decisions before starting cancer treatment: an environmental scan?

Crossref DOI link: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-018-0698-3

Published Online: 2018-11-19

Published Print: 2018-12

Update policy: https://doi.org/10.1007/springer_crossmark_policy

Authors

,

Mahmoodi, N. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8598-3733
Bekker, H. L.

King, N. V.

Hughes, J.

Jones, G. L.
Funding

Funding for this research was provided by:

Yorkshire Cancer Research (S391)
License Information

Text and Data Mining valid from 2018-11-19
More Information

Article History

Received: 1 June 2018

Accepted: 26 October 2018

First Online: 19 November 2018

Ethics approval and consent to participate

: Ethics approval granted by National Health Service (NHS) Health Research Authority (HRA), East Midlands Nottingham 1 Research Ethics Committee for the project in 2016, Reference: 16/EM/0122; HRA Reference: 194751. Ethics statements are not required for the environmental scan as data extracted from publicly available written documents.

: Not applicable.

: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Document is current

Any future updates will be listed below