Crossmark

Rationing cancer treatment: a qualitative study of perceptions of legitimate limit-setting

Crossref DOI link: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3137-3

Published Online: 2018-05-09

Published Print: 2018-12

Update policy: https://doi.org/10.1007/springer_crossmark_policy

Authors

Feiring, Eli http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5280-1051
Wang, Hege
License Information

Text and Data Mining valid from 2018-05-09
More Information

Article History

Received: 24 January 2017

Accepted: 22 April 2018

First Online: 9 May 2018

Ethics approval and consent to participate

: In compliance with Norwegian legislation on ethics in research, the study was regarded as health service research and was approved by the Norwegian Data Ethical Approval: Data Protection Official for Research, Norwegian Social Science Data Services (Project no 41815). Each participant provided written consent to participate.

: Each participant provided written consent to publish results.

: This study was developed as a research project at the University of Oslo.

: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.