DeVoe, Jennifer E.
Hoopes, Megan
Nelson, Christine A.
Cohen, Deborah J.
Sumic, Aleksandra http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9388-0830
Hall, Jennifer
Angier, Heather
Marino, Miguel
O’Malley, Jean P.
Gold, Rachel
Funding for this research was provided by:
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (308)
Article History
Received: 1 November 2017
Accepted: 26 April 2018
First Online: 10 May 2018
Ethics approval and consent to participate
: The study was reviewed and approved by the Oregon Health & Science University Institutional Review Board (IRB00000471). The IRB approved a waiver of documenting consent for study interviews with clinic leaders, clinicians, and staff, as the study was minimal risk and the research involved no procedures for which written consent is normally required outside the research context. An informed consent discussion was completed and the verbal consent was recorded. The IRB granted a waiver of consent for the EHR and Medicaid data used in the quantitative analyses as the study was minimal risk, waiving consent did not adversely affect the rights and welfare of the subjects, and the research could not be practicably carried out without the waiver.
: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.