Crossmark

Associations between primary care practice type and patient-reported access

Crossref DOI link: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3590-z

Published Online: 2018-10-16

Published Print: 2018-12

Update policy: https://doi.org/10.1007/springer_crossmark_policy

Authors

Selby, K http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9096-0720
Zuchuat, J-C

Cohidon, C

Senn, N
Funding

Funding for this research was provided by:

Swiss Federal Office of Statistics

Fondation Leenaards
License Information

Text and Data Mining valid from 2018-10-16
More Information

Article History

Received: 16 June 2017

Accepted: 1 October 2018

First Online: 16 October 2018

Ethics approval and consent to participate

: Local approval for this study was obtained from the ethical review board of the University of Lausanne, the Commission cantonale d’éthique de la recherche sur l’âtre humain. All patients gave written consent prior to participating.

: Not applicable

: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.