Crossmark

Advice from the health insurer as a channelling strategy: a natural experiment at a Dutch health insurance company

Crossref DOI link: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3624-6

Published Online: 2018-11-06

Published Print: 2018-12

Update policy: https://doi.org/10.1007/springer_crossmark_policy

Authors

Bes, Romy E. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2247-8326
Curfs, Emile C.

Groenewegen, Peter P.

de Jong, Judith D.
License Information

Text and Data Mining valid from 2018-11-06
More Information

Article History

Received: 20 July 2017

Accepted: 11 October 2018

First Online: 6 November 2018

Ethics approval and consent to participate

: According to Dutch Medical Research Involving Human Subject, approval by a medical ethics committee is not obligatory for carrying out this type of research (see: CCMO. Your research: does it fall under the WMO? The Hague, 2015). The return of a completed questionnaire is interpreted as informed consent for participation.

: Not applicable.

: RB and PG declare that they have no competing interests. JJ is an Associate Editor of BMC Health Services Research. During the data collection EC was employed part-time (40%) by health insurer VGZ.

: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.