,
Wagner, Anke http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5053-1753
Rieger, Monika A.
Manser, Tanja
Sturm, Heidrun
Hardt, Juliane
Martus, Peter
Lessing, Constanze
Hammer, Antje
Funding for this research was provided by:
Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen (IN-1148721)
Article History
Received: 24 January 2018
Accepted: 27 December 2018
First Online: 21 January 2019
Change Date: 22 January 2020
Change Type: Correction
Change Details: In the original publication of this article [1], the authors missed that reverse coding was necessary for the item “Do you work separate from your colleagues?” before calculating the scale ‘social relations’. So they corrected the analysis accordingly. The results with the revised scale show that there are no longer any significant differences between nurses and physicians with regard to this scale.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
: The WorkSafeMed study with all its components was approved by the responsible ethics committees of the medical faculties of the project partners in Bonn (#350/14) and Tubingen (#547/2014BO1). Each partner complied with confidentiality requirements according to German law. Informed verbal consent was sought from participants, who were informed that the study was voluntary and that they could withdraw at any time. The need for written consent is deemed unnecessary according to national regulations.The method of acquiring the consent was approved by the ethics committees.
: Informed verbal consent was sought from participants. All participants consented to have the results published as part of the informed consent process. The participants were assured of their confidentiality. The need for written consent is deemed unnecessary according to national regulations.The method of acquiring the consent was approved by the ethics committees.
: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.