,
van der Roest, Henriëtte G. http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9898-923X
van Eenoo, Liza
van Lier, Lisanne I.
Onder, Graziano
Garms-Homolová, Vjenka
Smit, Johannes H.
Finne-Soveri, Harriet
Jónsson, Pálmi V.
Draisma, Stasja
Declercq, Anja
Bosmans, Judith E.
van Hout, Hein P. J.
Funding for this research was provided by:
FP7 Health (305912)
Article History
Received: 4 November 2018
Accepted: 17 April 2019
First Online: 15 May 2019
Ethics approval and consent to participate
: Medical ethical approval for the study was provided by appropriate legal Ethical Boards in each of the participating countries. Belgium (Flanders): Commissie Medische Ethiek van de Universitair Medische Ziekenhuizen Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, No. ML10265; Finland: Tutkimuseettinen työryhmä, No. THL/796/6.02.01/ 533/2014; Germany: Ethikkommission des Institut für Psychologie und Arbeitswissenschaft der Technische Universtität Berlin, No. GH_01_20131022; Iceland: Vísindasiðanefnd, No. 13–176-S1; Italy: Comitato Etico Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, No. 2365/14; The Netherlands: Medical Ethics Review Committee VU University Medical Center, No. 2013.333.Written consent was sought from participants to the study according to local regulations. Only for clients from home care organizations that used interRAI-HC in routine care, informed consent was not required. These assessments were performed for clinical purposes by organizations’ own staff, and data were transferred anonymously to the national study centers. In none of the participating countries jurisdiction required informed consent for the use of anonymous clinical data for secondary research purposes. Informed consent from professional caregivers was obtained digitally before starting the online questionnaire.
: Not applicable.
: HR, GO, VG, HF, PJ, AD, and HH are members of interRAI. LE, LL, JS, and SD declare no competing interests.
: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.